| 
|
 |
view
Report......
The
policy makers had foreseen that the menace of growing population
and lack of employment opportunities in the country would create
serious unemployment situation. The private sector will not be able
to cope up with the growing unemployment. It would, therefore, be
the duty of State to generate employment opportunities. This was
very well taken by the makers of the Indian Constitution which refers
to the Right to Work under Directive Principles of State Policy
Article 39(a) urges the state to ensure that "the citizen,
men and women equally have the right to an adequate means of livelihood
and under Article 39(d) it has also been mentioned that there is
equal pay for work for both men and women. Further, it has been
stressed under Article-41 that the State shall, within the limits
of its economic capacity and development, make effective provision
for securing the right to work. The major focus of planning for
rural development has been the productive absorption of under-employed
and surplus labour force in the rural areas. A number of programmes,
namely National Rural Employment Programme (NREP), Rural Landless
Employment Guarantee Programme (RLEGP), Food For Work (FFW), Jawahar
Rozgar Yojna (JRY), Ensured Employment Scheme (EEC) with a view
to provide direct supplementary wage employment in rural areas.
Later on, during the year 2000 and 2004 two more programmes namely
Sampoorna Gramin Rojgar Yojna (SGRY) and National Food For Work
were launched all over the country with a view to provide supplementary
wage employment in rural areas, create durable public assets and
to ensure food security. These labour intensive programmes could
provide some relief to the rural poor through short duration casual
wage earning employment and provide some food security during the
period of acute drought conditions. However, these could neither
provide any guarantee to regular employment, nor durable
public assets could be created leading towards sustainable development.
The situation of unemployment has been compounded by the absence
of any social security mechanism. There was therefore an urgent
need to ensure a certain minimum days of employment in the shape
of manual labour to every household in the rural areas. This was
recognized by the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government,
which declared in its National Common Minimum Programme (NCMP) that
it will immediately enact a National Guarantee Act. This will provide
a legal Guarantee for atleast 100 days of employment, to begin with,
on asset creating public works every year at minimum wages for atleast
one able bodied person in every rural, urban poor and lower middleclass
household". The UPA government very soon translated its resolution
into action. Taking into account the experience gained under the
"Employment Guarantee Scheme" of Maharastra an outcome
of a struggle for protection from poverty and unemployment, resulting
especially from the massive drought of 1970-73. Numerous studies
indicate that the implementation of the Employment Guarantee scheme
by Maharastra had an impressive impact on the employment as compared
to other anti-poverty programmes in India. It is claimed by Maharastra
Government that EGS provided 70% employment in the state in the
year 1987-88. Taking a clue from the Maharastra experience the National
Advisory Council (NAC) proposed to enact a new legislation through
the National Rural Employment Guarantee Bill, 2004. The NAC did
not stop at drafting the act alone but it calculated that each man-days
of employment generated will cost Rs 100/-(wages) at 2004-05 prices.
This includes roughly Rs 60/- as wages and Rs 40/- for the non-Labour
component including administrative cost. Then100 days per household
on an average is fixed as the benchmark for the initial extent of
employment generation. Combining these two it is estimated that
multiplying the number of households below poverty line can derive
the annual cost of a full-fledged EGS by Rs 10,000. The rural population
below the poverty, as per census 2001,is estimated as 20 crore i.e.
4 crore household (5 per family).
The
National Rural Employment Guarantee Act 2005 was passed by Parliament
on 23rd August 2005 and it was promulgated on 7th September 2005.
Based on the Act the scheme of National Rural Employment Guarantee
scheme was ceremoniously launched by the Prime Minister, Dr Manmohan
Singh on Feb 2, 2006. Initially it covered 200 districts of the
country and in the coming three-years all the 600 districts are
to be covered in a phased manner. It has been envisaged under section-3
of the Act that the state government shall, in such rural areas
in the state as may be notified by the Central Government, provide
to every household whose adult members volunteer to do unskilled
manual work, not less than one hundred days of such work in a financial
year in accordance with the scheme made under the Act. For the purposes
of giving effect to the provision of Section-3, every state Government
shall within six months from the date of commencement of this Act,
by notification make a scheme for providing not less than one hundred
days of Guaranteed employment in a financial year to every household
in the rural areas covered under the scheme and whose adult members,
by application, volunteer to do unskilled manual work subject to
the conditions laid down by or under the Act and in the scheme.
It has been specifically mentioned in the Act that until any such
scheme is notified by the State Government, the Annual Action Plan
or Perspective Plan for the SGRY or NFFWP whichever is in force
in the concerned area immediately before such notification shall
be deemed to be the action plan for this scheme. The focus of the
scheme shall be on the following works in their order of priority-
-
water
conservation and water harvesting;
-
drought
proofing (including afforestation and tree plantation;
-
irrigation
canals including micro and minor irrigation works;
-
provision
of irrigation facility to land owned by the SCs/STs;
-
renovation
of traditional water bodies;
-
land
development;
-
flood
control and protection works including drainage in water looged
areas; rural
-
connectivity
to provide all-weather access, and
-
Any
other work notified by Central or State Government.
The
above-mentioned provisions of the Act indicate that the Government
is vigilant on
the issue of development priorities of the rural India. So far the
development works of
Gram Panchayat have been rotating round the construction of lanes
and drains. No efforts have been made by the Gram Panchayat to take
up such productive and assets creating activities which could have
led towards sustainable development. The Gram Panchayat have not
cared to preserve and protect the Gaon Samaj property. The utmost
harvesting of ground level water has led to the acute shortage of
water leading to the depletion of ground water sources. It is in
this background that the order of the priority has been fixed for
taking up the activities under NREGS. In order to fix up the priority,
annual action plan and perspective plan for every Gram Panchayat
has become a must. However, the experience gathered through the
VANI-UPVAN study of some districts of U.P under the scheme it is
perceived that development works in G.Ps are being initiated without
identifying the priorities.

|