|
Social
Audit
(Accountability and Responsibility in the Social Development) |
| 
|
 |
Background
Obviously, the human nature is to commit mistakes and when there
is an easy flow of funds, there are greater chances of misuse. Hence,
it is necessary to monitor his activities. It was in this background
that the bureaucratic pyramid was developed in public services and
special check measures were initiated through exercising a control,
particularly in financial matters. Thus a system of audit was introduced
in accounting system. However, this system did not suit with the
democratic planning and particularly decentralized governance.
In a democratic system of governance people are masters. The government
exists to serve the people. It is the primary duty of any master
to take a look at the accounts of the servants at regular intervals
and hold them accountable. Social audit is a step in that direction.
People use Right To Information to obtain details of the works carried
out by a government Department or the manner in which the money
was spent by that department. This information contained in records
is compared with field reality. This is public or social audit and
it is a very important tool in the hands of the people to hold the
government accountable. A public audit creates a lot of public pressure
on the legislative wing of the government to take corrective steps.
|
|


|
 |
|

Need
of Social Audit
The monitoring, evaluation and traditional audit could not be effective
due to their closed-door proceedings in a formal manner. This process
could neither hold the wrongdoers responsible nor it could provide
feedback for the future formulation and execution of development
works. On the other hand, due to lack of en-masse awareness the
pressure could not be built up on policy makers. Hence, there arose
the need of social audit based on following factors:
- Whatsoever
development works are executed, must be made public;
- The
implementers might always feel responsible and accountable to
public;
- The
public might always feel concerned regarding the implementation
of development works;
- The
people in common parlance might know their rights and the manner
to exercise the same;
- The
effective implementation of the development plans could be ensured;
Anticipated results are achieved; and
- Irregularities
might not occur.
Social
Audit Defined
Social audit is an ever-going process in which details of the
resources, both financial and non-financial, used by public agencies
for development initiatives, are shared with the people, often
through a public platform. Social Audit allows people to enforce
accountability and transparency, providing the ultimate users
an opportunity to scrutinize development initiatives.
A
social Audit committee needs to be constituted. There must be
members of the most vulnerable groups, women and people with disabilities
and other neglected community in this committee. This committee
will take up social audit process in that specific area and for
the chosen programme or activity. This committee will only play
the role of facilitation and compilation. It will not take any
decision or influence any views of the people. It is expected
to play the following role:
-
Environment
building on social audit;
-
Collect
and prepare list of information people need from time to time
(any thing any person may demand);
-
Facilitate transparency in programme implementation (display
of as much information as possible, keep the records for public
inspection at any point of time and collect feedback from
the people);
-
Transcribe the information into people's language (many times
it is difficult for the people to understand government language
or technical words);
-
Sorting
and analysis of information;
-
Sharing
the findings with respective person/s and collect his/her
opinion, feedbacks and reactions. This may be done collectively
in small groups or with individuals, if the person wants;
-
Compilation
of all findings (this may be done work-wise, head-wise or
group-wise as decided by the people);
-
Presentation
of findings (a particular day may be decided to present the
findings before all including implementing agency, administration,
people's representatives and other stake holders. This is
called Social Audit day;
-
Record
their views and suggestions and help implementer to rectify
or change the process wherever required and sort out if there
are any discrepancies in the work, as per suggestions.
Advantages
of social audit
(a) Trains the community on participatory local planning.
(b) Encourages
local democracy.
(c) Encourages
community participation.
(d) Benefits
disadvantaged groups.
(e) Promotes
collective decision making and sharing responsibilities.
(f) Develops
human resources and social capital.
Social
Audit & Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs)
The
Gram Sabhas have been entrusted with the responsibilities of
reviewing planning and executions of village development plans
and ultimately place. Their recommendations, for execution before
the Gram Panchayats under section-11 (3) of the UP Panchayat
Raj Act, 1947. The Gram Sabhas have to enlist people's participation
and thus to provide a fillip to the village development works.
The PRIs have been empowered for an active role under National
Rural Employment Guarantee Act, 2005 (NREGA). It is being discussed
in subsequent paragraphs.
Social Audit
& NREGA
Perhaps
it is the first Act, which has empowered the gram sabha to monitor
the execution of works under NREGS. Section-17 of the said Act
Lays down that:
-
The
Gram Sabha shall monitor the execution of work within
the Gram Panchayat;
-
The Gram Sabha shall conduct regular social audits of
all the projects under the Scheme taken up within the
Gram Panchayat; and
-
The
Gram Panchayat shall make available all relevant documents
including the muster rolls, bills, vouchers, measurement
books, copies of sanction orders and other connected
books of account and papers to the Gram Sabha for
the purpose of conducting the social audit.
In
Uttar Pradesh the work of Social Audit has been initiated
alongwith the implementation of NREGA. Besides the Gram Sabhas
some of the NGOs have been nominated for doing the social
audit of the Uttar Pradesh Gramin Rozgar Guarantee Scheme.
Reports are coming up and it is yet to be seen as to how the
government utilizes these social audit reports. The gram sabhas
are yet to open their account, in the field of Social Audit.
They have a long way to go to understand the process of Social
Audit. It is also interesting to observe as to how the government
makes the weak gram sabhas strong and capable to take up this
assignment and execute it successfully.
|
|